International Sanctions and Their Effects on Arbitration

by Mr. Turgut Aycan Özcan, LL.M.

International sanctions, imposed by states or international organizations, significantly impact international commercial arbitration. This article analyzes how sanctions affect the enforceability of arbitral awards, the conduct of arbitral proceedings, and the overall effectiveness of arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism. It will also explore the differing perspectives on the interplay between sanctions and arbitration, and consider future implications for the field.

The imposition of sanctions creates a complex legal landscape for international arbitration. Sanctions regimes, often targeting specific individuals, entities, or states, can directly influence an arbitration’s jurisdiction and the enforceability of resulting awards. For instance, if a party subject to sanctions is involved in an arbitration, the tribunal might face challenges in obtaining evidence or conducting hearings. The ability to enforce an award against a sanctioned party might also be severely hampered, given the restrictions imposed by the sanctioning state. This can render the arbitration process less effective and undermine the principle of finality that underlies arbitration.

A key challenge arises regarding the enforceability of arbitral awards under the New York Convention. While the Convention mandates the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, sanctions regimes can create exceptions. Courts in sanctioning states often refuse to enforce awards in favor of sanctioned entities. This creates jurisdictional uncertainty and undermines investor confidence. The application of sanctions can also affect the impartiality and independence of arbitrators. If an arbitrator is a national of a sanctioning state or has ties to a sanctioned party, concerns regarding potential bias might arise. Tribunals must navigate these sensitive issues to ensure procedural fairness.

Different perspectives exist on how to address the complexities of sanctions and arbitration. Some argue for a strict application of sanctions, prioritizing the enforcement of national security interests. Others emphasize the importance of maintaining the integrity of international arbitration, advocating for measures to minimize the disruptive effects of sanctions. This divergence of views often leads to protracted legal battles and delays in dispute resolution. The International Bar Association and other professional organizations actively engage in discussions aimed at harmonizing approaches and developing guidelines to handle the challenges presented by sanctions.

The impact of sanctions on arbitration is not limited to enforcement. Sanctions can affect the conduct of the arbitration itself. Parties subject to sanctions might face difficulties in securing legal representation, transferring funds, or accessing necessary information. These difficulties can disrupt the proceedings and impede a fair and efficient resolution of disputes. Furthermore, sanctions might indirectly impact the choice of arbitration seat. Parties might choose a seat that is less likely to be influenced by sanctions or that offers greater certainty regarding the enforcement of the award.

Recent years have seen significant developments in this area. The increasing use of targeted sanctions has heightened the challenges faced by international arbitration. Cases involving sanctions are becoming more frequent, and the legal arguments surrounding the interplay between sanctions and arbitration are becoming increasingly sophisticated. Developments such as the expansion of extraterritorial sanctions by some states and the increasing influence of multilateral sanction regimes further complicate the issue. This necessitates a robust and adaptable legal framework capable of accommodating the evolving geopolitical landscape.

The future of arbitration in the context of sanctions requires a multi-faceted approach. This includes improving international cooperation among states, clarifying the legal framework governing sanctions and arbitration, and developing best practices for tribunals and practitioners. International organizations and professional bodies can play a pivotal role in promoting dialogue and formulating guidelines to minimize the disruptive effects of sanctions on arbitration. Ultimately, striking a balance between upholding the integrity of international arbitration and complying with national security concerns is crucial for ensuring the effectiveness and legitimacy of the system. Further research and judicial pronouncements will continue to shape the interplay between sanctions and arbitration, guiding the development of appropriate legal frameworks and practices to navigate this complex intersection.

---

References

International Bar Association. (2019). IBA Guidelines on Sanctions and International Arbitration.  International Bar Association.

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL). (Various years).  Annual reports and publications on international arbitration.

Redfern, A., Hunter, M., & Blackaby, N. (2017). Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration. Sweet & Maxwell.